Kazuki1game Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 I am Kazuki, a famous SA player of the MxM, Owner of the SMK Guild, we were very active in the game. The biggest issue at the moment is about the League of Legends being dying, and the moba genre is lacking a new innovator moba. I think it's best to relaunch the Master x Master. Those who already need to invest in smart marketing. Here are some ideas: - Launch the game on Steam, because it has a great attention of the community - Pay Streamers famous in each region to play and publicize the game, and advertise on sites advertisements - Creem SA Server, Brazil is a top-notch program for the world, especially for Weight Streamers and Youtubers. - Make Daily Events The MxM is becoming a Great Game! Moba is a genre with a lot of public that does not get along with the Genre Battle Royale, they want a new game. MxM is a game with potential for being quite innovative, only sinned in Marketing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadly Intent Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 They didn't listen to the players when the game still existed. It's probably less than likely they will listen to them now that the game is gone. They've already stated they will NOT create any more servers (SA or SEA). There must be a reason (money?) that they haven't put bns on Steam. The same thing would hold for a new release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Showta Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 I wanna say something, but at the same time...I like posting in the forums and I can't see myself still being allowed to do that if I said it, so what I'll say instead is; That would not be a good idea for a handful of very very good reasons. Maybe someone else can pick it up. Or just play BnS, a lot of their decisions lately have been along the same liAND ACTUALLY isn't there still the KR version? Maybe you could play on that a little. Run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KlausFlouride Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 1 hour ago, Deadly Intent said: They didn't listen to the players when the game still existed. It's probably less than likely they will listen to them now that the game is gone. They've already stated they will NOT create any more servers (SA or SEA). There must be a reason (money?) that they haven't put bns on Steam. The same thing would hold for a new release. This. The game did a lot right, such as the lobby and launcher, on the flip side it did one thing very wrong; not listening to the players. It was painfully evident, from early beta, these guys had no interest in doing anything the players wanted in order to make the game better. On a side not stop trying to make NCWest waste money on SA servers, its to small a market not mater what you say. I am thinking Valve/Steam want a cut of what NCWest generates off their games and NC isn't down with sharing even know it would generate a lot of revenue they normally wouldn't have access to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wataru Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 It didn't have anything from Guild Wars 1. The BNS costume you got was female only. BNS characters were too cliché. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kozuki Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 Insufficient Fund. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RavTH Posted September 3, 2018 Share Posted September 3, 2018 the game was fun, but it got boring pretty fast tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiuJitsuBuddha Posted September 6, 2018 Share Posted September 6, 2018 Gaming sites have reported that Steam requires a 10%-30% share of all revenue from any game it lists -it differs depending on negotiations (and is actually private NDA so above is just testimonials from anonymous developers who cite those figures) .. which is about standard since Apple Store, I Tunes, Google Play, & Uber & Lyft, GrubHub, DoorDash, etc all charge about 30% share of all revenue also from the apps & drivers it lists but most businesses don't want to give over 10%-30% to another business if the added number of users/revenue doesn't exceed the 10%-30% cut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.