VV VV

When you said you wouldn't censor anything...

Recommended Posts

Arohk   

why do you complain about some stupid swastikas, 

the first outfit looks even better now without the swastika on the back.

 

I think removing a symbol that gets associated with the Nazi's is a good move altogh it isn't even the same symbol because it goes in the other direction.

 

Portraying the Nazi swastika is against the law in Germany and Austria for example, you can get sues for offences. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I don't particulary care about the matter one way or the other...

28 minutes ago, Arohk said:

Portraying the Nazi swastika is against the law in Germany and Austria for example, you can get sues for offences. 

False advertisement is not lawful either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Arohk   
5 hours ago, Finsternis said:

While I don't particulary care about the matter one way or the other...

False advertisement is not lawful either.

you are talking about "legal deception", sadly there is no law that forbids this.

especially in the food industry. 

Advertising a "cherry juice" which is 90% apple juice and some cherry flavor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brand X   
1 minute ago, Arohk said:

you are talking about "legal deception", sadly there is no law that forbids this.

especially in the food industry. 

Advertising a "cherry juice" which is 90% apple juice and some cherry flavor.

I think they're talking about "no censoring" and then censoring.  There was no half way point (or using your example 10% way point) in that.

 

"We won't censor!"  then they censor :p

 

What gets me, is there are players saying "It's okay!" when if this was political I bet they'd be the first to rip on the least favorite side and *cricket* about the lies :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Arohk said:

you are talking about "legal deception", sadly there is no law that forbids this.

especially in the food industry. 

Advertising a "cherry juice" which is 90% apple juice and some cherry flavor.

Yes, people mind. The EU lawmakers already made it clear that a packaging may not be untrue, wrong, ambiguous, conflicting or unintelligible. You can not advertise juice as apple juice, when most of it is made of some other fruit.
 

Also, what Brand X said - there are no percentages. They didn't say "we don't censor some of it", they said "we don't censor".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VV VV   

Guys, what granny ?

 

It's interesting to see how China censors tits and asses, while USA censors political/religious symbols. Different cultures i guess...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kichi   
3 minutes ago, VV VV said:

Guys, what granny ?

you dont know Granny? Shame on you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bretto   

In this thread people say. "NCSOFT LIED TO YOU GET OVER IT!"  Doesn't anyone care about the integrity behind these games?.. because to me its becoming more nonexistent.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lurkios   
1 hour ago, Bretto said:

In this thread people say. "NCSOFT LIED TO YOU GET OVER IT!"  Doesn't anyone care about the integrity behind these games?.. because to me its becoming more nonexistent.   

Heh, you expected "integrity" from NC. That's cute~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously, that's simply the ESL issue. Anyone with any sort of familiarity with how to write a document that will be scrutinized by a potentially explosive and easily offended audicene would have put something like:

 

NCWest did not censor the content of the original, however, some modifications, refinements and adaptations were made in order to streamline our valuable players' experience and better fit the content into the cultural spectrum of the NA/EU audience. ;)

 

Seriously though, I'd rather they did edit, because... yeah. I wish.

Edited by DomiSotto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeon   

Really? You are butthurt over this? Lolz.

 

I actually support NCSoft on this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Covet   
8 hours ago, Yeon said:

Really? You are butthurt over this? Lolz.

 

I actually support NCSoft on this one.

Which NCSoft do you support on this issue? The NCSoft that said they were not going to do any kind of censorship because they want the art to be exactly the way it was intended to be seen? Or do you support the NCSoft that changed the art AFTER they said roughly 9 times that there would be no changes because they want the art to be seen as was intended by the artists.

 

Just curious which one you are saying you support. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeon   
On 21.04.2016 at 7:31 AM, Covet said:

Which NCSoft do you support on this issue? The NCSoft that said they were not going to do any kind of censorship because they want the art to be exactly the way it was intended to be seen? Or do you support the NCSoft that changed the art AFTER they said roughly 9 times that there would be no changes because they want the art to be seen as was intended by the artists.

 

Just curious which one you are saying you support. 

Isn't it obvious? NCWest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now