DarkSkyBunny Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 i've been messing around with rumble bees in nightshade all day and i love the ability to use it even if you don't have focus. my question is, is it viable to use in pvp in place of sunflower? i have 50% crit could probably get more if i looked for better base soul shields. the fact that it also doesn't matter what terrain your on is also helpful because unlike sunflower which goes in a straight line even if your on a hill making sunflower miss your enemy completely if your above or below the on the hill, rumble bees curves. i'm talking about the 3 left points where you can move and cast it also cast with out focus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zephyranthes Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 Rumblebees with HM Skill is supposed to be good at PvP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myleina Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 Personally I use the rumblebee Branch 1 a lot in pvp and I've never had issues with it. I feel sunflower costs way too much focus to be reliable in pvp. I only use it against summoners (for the AoE against kitty) and assassins (to break their stealth). Also use it in 3v3 for same reason as against summoners... AoE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkSkyBunny Posted February 15, 2016 Author Share Posted February 15, 2016 k i'd probably use sunflower for aoe pulls in pve dono if i'd bother with it in owpvp where your fighting a zerg. probably would cause of its massive dmg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myleina Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 Yeah in world pvp you want sunflower for sure. But in 1v1 arena Rumblebee is quite nice. And if you get the hongmoon upgrade, even nicer, if target is CCed (any CC), it costs 0 and is instant cast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.