Jump to content

Dotimus

Members
  • Posts

    618
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dotimus

  1. 12 hours ago, Divine Dragon Soul said:

    Ryzen 5 1600x = 250$

    8 gb GTX 1070 = 400$

    16 gb RAM (2x8) 3000mhz  = 140$

    Mainboard x370 = 150$

    500 gb ssd m2 (r/w 2000mb/s) = 200$

     

    Total = 1150$ = i7 6900K

    still.....

    i would go with the 1500x , still 16MB cache L3 and just 65W tdp, i still don't need more than 4 physical cores ( nor does the game...)

     

    but the (current) problem with the config you wrote is just NVIDIA's *cricket* drivers (at least according to anand's DX9 bench) .

     

     

  2. 45 minutes ago, Dyeless said:

     that fix benchmark and 499 amd cpu vs 250 intel.

    OPEN YOUR EYES, they cost about the same the same is not a 400 vs a 250 is a 250 vs a 250

    he linked the R5 not the R7 ryzen ffs look at the red lines, not the gray ones, there is no point in using a $1k cpu for BNS, YOU WILL NOT GET MORE FPS JUST BECAUSE THE ENGINE DOES NOT SCALE

  3. 2 hours ago, Dyeless said:

    New and cheap ssd that are faster then pci ssd will be soon out for intel. You can get it for 50 - 70 euros and that will be awesome for game loading and windows apps etc. There are much more features intel has that amd can't even touch but not many talking about that. And if you look at pricing then think again, older generation intel still kicks in performance. And only paid reviewers show amd glory while other show more realistic results. Sure you can OC but it's not that straight forward + many have problems. I bet next generation of amd maybe will start turning tables but this is nothing more but hype. And from what I've seen intel hater could not afford intel cpu and then with new amd there is a reason or excuse to hate more. Rarely you will hear someone with i7 complaining and can't wait to switch.

     

    Amd never was consistent with their performance and they even never stick to their technology like mantle.

    if you are talking are talking about their "new" optane memory that was a flop on the enterprise and they just starting to sell them as a caching solution for ppl with mechanical HD's you made my day.... seriously you don't seem to know what you are talking about. WHO THE HELL WILL USE ONE M2 SLOT FOR THAT WHEN YOU ARE WAY BETTER IN JUST PUTTING A M2 SSD THERE? is not like motherboards or laptops have ten's of those.

     

    even Micron (their tech partner) is staying away from 3d Xpoint for now cause the tech is not mature

    in case you are wondering why i call it a flop is cause they initially stated a 1000X faster than nand and now that we have producs is more like 10x at most better than nand. is not that it isn't good, but nothing close to initial performance they anounced.

     

    but this discussion is derailing in a AMD vs INTEL kind of a thread.....

  4. On 3/2/2017 at 6:48 AM, Marqin said:

    Hi,

     

    Has already anyone benchmarked how Blade and Soul works on those new Ryzen CPUs and can share results?

     

    Btw. did we also get better multi-core support with 64-bit client, or it's still KR-only?

     

    2 hours ago, Space Jesus said:

    So no one with the same GPU can answer if Ryzen is worst than i5 on BnS ?

    I'm looking for Ryzen R5 VS Core i5 + GTX 1060 VS RX 480 comparison

    on R5, depends on the GPU it seems, if you are using a NVIDIA GPUit sucks comparing to intel (NV drivers are probably not optimized for AMD platforms), if you are using a pure AMD platform (Ryzen 5 paired with R9 or 480) is is as good as the intel platform.

     

    anand's directx9 benchmarks:

     

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/11244/the-amd-ryzen-5-1600x-vs-core-i5-review-twelve-threads-vs-four/14

     

    PS: i dont know if NC is using builds with intel's TBB ( in that case intel might be ahead a few percent points)

    and then is also the problem with physX, as it is meant to do do GPU acceleration on NV GPUs, so if you go AMD route, you  will probably also loose a few % of the rysen core usage for the physics simulations

  5. 7 minutes ago, Jem said:

    Good god. So many things I wanna say... lord.

     

    I thought that character on the far right was a Yun but it's a Jin LMAO.

    Are you playing on a laptop or something?

    ya, unfortunately on a laptop.... with the cancer resolution of 1366x768.... but at least I can pull the textures to 5 without any problem

  6. After last night finally getting the  -->150 <-- fragments from the coralite.....

     

    today i took the day off Bns work...

    here it goes, lot of work to get them on the same picture :p

     

    OnclvN.jpg

    not perfect but i was already without time after all the posing....

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...