Nirv Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Hello! i use cheap mouse with multiple buttons. I use one mouse button for one keyboard button. ( i have small hands) My question is. If i will write two keyboard buttons for one mouse button ( for example F and 4)) w/o any delay time etc, just to make it work one after another like this: i click one time for F, second time for 4 and again one time for F and again and again... If 4 is on reuse i will spam only F till 4 will be on, one after possible another. Is that macro? I dont understand that "macros" but i heard people always talkin about perfet ani cancel with delay beetween buttons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanosaki Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 No, this is fine (the software used by it though might get raged by the gameguard, otherwise it's fine to use it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nirv Posted March 11, 2016 Author Share Posted March 11, 2016 Anyone else can confirm this? Im still afraid for get ban :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorion Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 https://gyazo.com/10164a2fb575e67df566be6786ec48c0 I also have an email from NCsoft that states that they do not ban players for using mouse or keyboard software. My email states that they ban automated play - and they refer to bots. The screenshot above also states that simple macros (2 keys bound to 1 mouse button) is ok. The rest is a greyzone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zubatusedfly Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 its more of a "use at your own risk". players have not been banned for setting one key to one button. HOWEVER, a player has been banned for binding SS to a mouse key as in the TOS its actually a violation. so one button - fine. 2 button macro? not worth the risk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.